What makes kihon different from other techniques? For one thing, they are considered more foundational - kihon are the building blocks of other techniques.
But also, kihon are usually stripped of their practical fight context and placed into an artificial context or structure to make them easier to do many repetitions more easily. For instance, uchikomi in judo are set up so that you can efficiently do many, many reps of them, but the techniques in shiai and randori often do not happen just like uchikomi.
One of my favorite practices is taking kihon into pieces and doing them in steps, or "by the numbers." Since the structure of kihon is somewhat arbitrary, you can conceivably break the same action into different numbers of steps.
I like to do kihon with three steps for a while, then do the same kihon with four steps, then with five steps and so on, breaking each action into more microscopic parts for examination.
For instance, in Jo you can do kihon #1 - honteuchi - in 3 steps...
Or you can do 4 steps...
4-point at eyes
Or 5 steps...
5-point at eyes
Each time you divide a step into two is an opportunity to explore the kihon in greater detail - and there is no end to the potential for explorations with this method.
Someone asked me a while back to post what I consider to be pros and cons of aikido and judo – sort of what I like and dislike about aiki...
People often ask me at what age should they start their kids in martial arts. I will occasionally take kids as young as 3-4 as long as the p...
Another thing that Chad asked for the other day in his comment to my post about teaching kids judo was some description of our favorite ...
Here is a good example of one phenomenon that I talked about at the seminar this past weekend. In these film clips the point of view ...
So many readers have enjoyed my aikido vs. judo article from last year that I figured I'd try my hand at doing a comparison between ...